Atlético and the arbitration controversy: Were they right?
The recent arbitration controversy surrounding a penalty, where a goal was disallowed for an alleged double touch, has revived a debate that closely touches Atlético de Madrid.
According to former professional referee Iturralde González, the key does not lie in whether or not there was a double touch, but in the interpretation of IFAB rule 14: was the ball in play? Iturralde, through a video on social networks, argues that the fundamental thing is to determine if the initial hit clearly displaced the ball.
This point is crucial, since, according to the rule, the ball comes into play when it is hit and clearly displaced. To illustrate his argument, Iturralde uses a recent modification in the corner rule, where a clear displacement of the ball is required for it to be in play.
This similarity, according to the former referee, reinforces Atlético de Madrid’s position regarding the arbitration decision. The discussion now focuses on the literal nature of the rule and its correct application, an aspect that could have influenced the final result. The arbitration controversy, far from dying down, continues to generate debate among fans and experts, reopening old wounds and fueling the passion for football.
