Atlético's Penalty: The Refereeing Debate Red Hot
Atlético de Madrid’s Champions League elimination continues to generate controversy, especially regarding the disallowed penalty to Julián Álvarez. Former referee Iturralde González has brought a new perspective to the debate, focusing attention on the literal interpretation of IFAB rule 14.
According to Iturralde, the key is not whether the player touched the ball twice, but whether it was struck and clearly displaced, thus being considered in play. Iturralde argues that, according to the images, it is not entirely clear that Julián Álvarez touched the ball twice.
However, his main objection lies in the interpretation of the rule, comparing it to a recent modification in the corner kick rule, where a clear displacement of the ball is required for it to be in play.
The former referee also questions the validity of the UEFA statement, pointing out internal contradictions and suggesting that the decision to disallow the penalty and send it for review to IFAB puts the body in a compromised situation.
Iturralde wonders why UEFA would submit an action it considers correct for review, arguing that it should be Atlético de Madrid, as a possible aggrieved party, who should request such a review. Ultimately, the controversy is served and continues to fuel the debate among the ‘rojiblancos’ fans.
