Atleti Fans Demand Legal Action After Disallowed Goal

Atlético de Madrid fans refuse to accept the controversial disallowed goal by Julián and demand that the club exhaust all possible legal avenues to defend their interests. Following Atlético’s statement regretting what happened and assuming the result is unchangeable, fan groups have mobilized demanding a more forceful response.

The International Union of Fan Clubs has issued a statement expressing its rejection of UEFA’s attitude, calling it an “adulteration of the competition.” The Union regrets the lack of decisive action by the club, urging the challenging of the match and/or legal action, recalling that “listening to the fans is always an obligation.” They insist that Atlético must act with the utmost energy to repair the damage caused.

Similarly, the Los 50 fan club also requests that Atlético explore any legal avenue in defense of its interests, pointing out irregularities in the process of disallowing the goal. According to the fan club, the referee contradicts UEFA and violates the VAR protocol, which questions the legality of the decision.

Furthermore, they argue that the regulations state that the ball is in play when it is clearly struck and moved, something that is not demonstrated in the video provided by UEFA. The Rojiblanco fans unite in an outcry for the club to defend their honor and fight for what they consider an injustice.

read the original article

Iturralde Questions UEFA's Explanation on the Penalty

Eduardo Iturralde González, a former referee, has analyzed the controversial play of Julián Álvarez’s double touch on the penalty during the Champions League match against Real Madrid.

In his appearance on El Larguero, Iturralde expressed skepticism towards UEFA’s statement, stating that instead of clarifying the situation, it generates even more confusion. “I am not convinced by UEFA’s explanations,” Iturralde declared.

“The statement itself contradicts, leaving the person who wrote it in an unfavorable position”. According to Iturralde, UEFA is trying to justify the annulment of the goal based on rule 14.1, which states that if a player touches the ball twice in a penalty, it must be annulled.

However, the former referee points out that the same rule indicates that the ball is in play when it is hit and moves clearly, creating a contradiction. Iturralde also criticized UEFA’s decision to consider the option of modifying the rule in IFAB.

“If UEFA validates the annulment of the goal and states that the referee acted correctly according to the rule, why submit it to review in IFAB?” Iturralde questioned, suggesting that this action would imply a doubt about the correctness of the arbitral decision. In his opinion, it should be Atlético de Madrid, who considers themselves harmed, who requests the review, not UEFA.

read the original article

Atleti: From Pain to Pride, Looking to the Future

After the painful Champions League elimination, Atlético de Madrid rises with pride and looks ahead. The team, with the unconditional support of its fans, assimilates the frustration of falling in the penalty shootout, but focuses on the challenges ahead, including the crucial match against Barcelona.

Statements from Oblak, Koke, Giménez and Julián Alvarez reflect the mix of anger and gratitude towards the fans, acknowledging the team’s effort and dedication on the field. Koke, eager to return to the pitch, highlights the fighting spirit and the need for the unconditional support of the fans to face the remaining competitions.

The Rojiblancos dressing room, led by Simeone, conveys a message of unity and determination, acknowledging the hard blow but maintaining the ambition to continue competing at the highest level. Despite the pain, Atlético de Madrid is resilient and focused on the future, ready to prove its worth in the upcoming challenges. Anger and complaints among the veteran Rojiblancos. Arbitration criticism after the match.

read the original article

De Paul, heart and engine of Atleti

Rodrigo De Paul, after a titanic effort in the derby, has become a key player for Atlético de Madrid. Despite arriving touched by a knee injury suffered against Getafe, the Argentinian forced himself to illuminate the team’s game, even participating in the goal.

Alongside a great Pablo Barrios, De Paul dominated the midfield, standing out as the second player with the most completed passes, leader in chances created, passes in the final third, crosses attempted and recoveries. Simeone needs De Paul for the crucial match against Barcelona.

The player’s commitment to Atleti, previously questioned, has dissipated this season, becoming an undisputed leader and reference point. The Metropolitano applauded him when he was substituted, demonstrating the affection that the fans now have for him.

In addition, César Azpilicueta has returned after his injury. The veteran defender, after recovering from his injury, provided security and experience in extra time against Real Madrid, winning duels and demonstrating that, at 35 years old, he is still ready to add to the team. Now, De Paul will test himself before leaving with the Argentinian national team. Atlético needs him at his best.

read the original article

Arbitral Controversy: Should Atlético have Appealed?

The match against Real Madrid continues to generate controversy, especially regarding the annulment of Julián Álvarez’s penalty. Toni Roca, an expert in sports law, has analyzed the play and his opinion is clear: the rule was applied incorrectly.

According to Roca, Article 14 of the IFAB, which Atlético clung to, establishes that the ball is in play when it is hit and clearly moves. In the case of Álvarez’s penalty, the touch was so slight that, in the expert’s opinion, the ball never really came into play.

Roca argues that the rule does not prohibit touching the ball twice, but rather playing it again before another player touches it, which did not happen in the action. Based on this interpretation, Roca believes that the annulment of the penalty was a mistake.

In fact, if he were in Atlético’s position, Roca assures that he would appeal the match or, at least, request that the kick be repeated. His reasoning is based on the literal interpretation of the rules, where the meaning of the words is fundamental. The arbitral controversy has generated an intense debate among fans and experts, leaving open the question of whether Atlético should have taken legal action to defend its interests.

read the original article

Courage and heart! Atleti gave it their all

In a high-voltage match, Atlético de Madrid once again demonstrated their grit and fighting spirit. Despite the difficulties, the team stood firm, showing a defensive solidity that greatly complicated the rival’s attack.

The coach planned an intelligent match, aware of the need to minimize spaces and nullify the opponent’s virtues. Although the result was not as expected, the players gave their all. The team emptied themselves on the field, fighting for every ball and showing great intensity in every action.

The fans, as always, played a fundamental role, cheering incessantly and creating an atmosphere of unparalleled support at the Metropolitano. The match demonstrated, once again, Atlético’s ability to compete at the highest level. Despite absences and adversities, the team was able to remain true to their style, demonstrating that with courage and heart, all obstacles can be overcome. The season is still long and Atleti has much to say! Aúpa Atleti!

read the original article

Key Refereeing Decision in the Madrid Derby

The Champions League second leg match between Atlético de Madrid and Real Madrid continues to generate debate, especially regarding the controversial play that led to the annulment of a goal.

Szymon Marciniak, the referee of the match, has revealed crucial details about his decision, confirming that he was the one who alerted VAR about the possible double touch by Álvarez at the moment of the shot.

Marciniak expressed surprise at the uniqueness of the situation, admitting that he had never faced something similar in his refereeing career. He clarified that no Real Madrid player influenced the review of the play, refuting unfounded rumors.

UEFA, for its part, issued a statement supporting the referee’s decision, with a video that shows Álvarez’s double touch. The refereeing controversy, far from tarnishing the competitive spirit of the team, has reinforced the determination and fighting character that define Atlético de Madrid. These types of adverse situations make us even stronger, demonstrating that with passion and dedication, we can overcome any obstacle. Aúpa Atleti!

read the original article

Up Atleti! Reaction and Future After the Match

Atlético de Madrid has experienced intense days after the Champions League elimination against Real Madrid. Despite the initial “incredulity” regarding the annulment of Julián Álvarez’s goal after VAR intervention, the club maintains a constructive attitude focused on the future.

Internal sources expressed to EFE the “frustration” and “tremendous damage” caused by the situation, considering it an “error in the use of VAR” which, although it will not change the result, has affected the fans’ hope and the team’s effort.

Despite the controversy, Atlético has acted with professionalism, formally requesting explanations from UEFA and showing its willingness to collaborate to improve the refereeing system.

The club acknowledges the seriousness of the incident but maintains its respect for the refereeing work and its commitment to fair play. Atlético de Madrid reaffirms its competitive DNA and its determination to overcome obstacles.

Far from looking for excuses, the club focuses on the next challenges, starting with the important match against Barcelona. The goal is clear: to continue working with dedication to achieve the proposed goals and bring joy to the Colchoneros fans. From the club, a message of unity and optimism is transmitted, inviting the fans to continue supporting the team in every match. Up Atleti!

read the original article

Arbitral Polemic Ignites Atleti Legends

The Atlético de Madrid world is seething after the controversial refereeing decision that disallowed a penalty in their favor. Club legends such as Rubén Cano have raised their voices, calling the situation a “robbery” of historic proportions, even comparing it to the infamous Guruceta case.

Cano, visibly indignant, highlights the presence of cameras and the review by multiple people, which, in his opinion, makes the decision even more inexplicable. The former striker questions the justification of the second touch on the penalty, arguing the physical impossibility of a strike of such power and precision after a prior contact.

Other Rojiblancos references such as ‘Petete’ Correa, who called it a “shame,” and Paulo Futre, have also joined the criticisms, recalling other refereeing errors that have harmed the team, such as the goal disallowed to Perea against Real Madrid.

The Colchoneros fans share the feeling of their idols, expressing their frustration and anger at what they consider an offense. The debate continues to rage, with the athletic community united in defending their colors and their outrage at decisions that, in their view, harm the club. The general feeling is that these types of situations undermine the integrity of the game and deserve a thorough review to prevent them from happening again.

read the original article

Refereeing Controversy in the Euroderby: Atleti Defends Its Position

Atlético de Madrid’s recent Champions League elimination against Real Madrid continues to generate controversy, especially regarding the annulled goal by Julián Álvarez in the penalty shootout.

The referee’s decision, justified by UEFA based on Article 14 of the IFAB, has unleashed the fury of the Rojiblancos fans. However, Atlético clings to an excerpt from the same rule to defend the validity of the goal.

The key lies in the interpretation of the ‘clarity’ of the ball’s movement after the strike. The club believes that Julián’s contact, clearly involuntary, was imperceptible at the time of the penalty and was only proven hours later by UEFA.

This situation has generated an intense debate within UEFA, where the application of the rule in cases of involuntary contact is being questioned. The play, far from being forgotten, promises to continue generating controversy in the coming days.

Atleti, with the support of its fans, does not give up and seeks to defend its position against a decision it considers unfair. The passion and Rojiblancos pride remain intact, ready to face the upcoming challenges with the determination that characterizes the team.

read the original article