De Paul, heart and engine of Atleti

Rodrigo De Paul, after a titanic effort in the derby, has become a key player for Atlético de Madrid. Despite arriving touched by a knee injury suffered against Getafe, the Argentinian forced himself to illuminate the team’s game, even participating in the goal.

Alongside a great Pablo Barrios, De Paul dominated the midfield, standing out as the second player with the most completed passes, leader in chances created, passes in the final third, crosses attempted and recoveries. Simeone needs De Paul for the crucial match against Barcelona.

The player’s commitment to Atleti, previously questioned, has dissipated this season, becoming an undisputed leader and reference point. The Metropolitano applauded him when he was substituted, demonstrating the affection that the fans now have for him.

In addition, César Azpilicueta has returned after his injury. The veteran defender, after recovering from his injury, provided security and experience in extra time against Real Madrid, winning duels and demonstrating that, at 35 years old, he is still ready to add to the team. Now, De Paul will test himself before leaving with the Argentinian national team. Atlético needs him at his best.

read the original article

Arbitral Controversy: Should Atlético have Appealed?

The match against Real Madrid continues to generate controversy, especially regarding the annulment of Julián Álvarez’s penalty. Toni Roca, an expert in sports law, has analyzed the play and his opinion is clear: the rule was applied incorrectly.

According to Roca, Article 14 of the IFAB, which Atlético clung to, establishes that the ball is in play when it is hit and clearly moves. In the case of Álvarez’s penalty, the touch was so slight that, in the expert’s opinion, the ball never really came into play.

Roca argues that the rule does not prohibit touching the ball twice, but rather playing it again before another player touches it, which did not happen in the action. Based on this interpretation, Roca believes that the annulment of the penalty was a mistake.

In fact, if he were in Atlético’s position, Roca assures that he would appeal the match or, at least, request that the kick be repeated. His reasoning is based on the literal interpretation of the rules, where the meaning of the words is fundamental. The arbitral controversy has generated an intense debate among fans and experts, leaving open the question of whether Atlético should have taken legal action to defend its interests.

read the original article

Courage and heart! Atleti gave it their all

In a high-voltage match, Atlético de Madrid once again demonstrated their grit and fighting spirit. Despite the difficulties, the team stood firm, showing a defensive solidity that greatly complicated the rival’s attack.

The coach planned an intelligent match, aware of the need to minimize spaces and nullify the opponent’s virtues. Although the result was not as expected, the players gave their all. The team emptied themselves on the field, fighting for every ball and showing great intensity in every action.

The fans, as always, played a fundamental role, cheering incessantly and creating an atmosphere of unparalleled support at the Metropolitano. The match demonstrated, once again, Atlético’s ability to compete at the highest level. Despite absences and adversities, the team was able to remain true to their style, demonstrating that with courage and heart, all obstacles can be overcome. The season is still long and Atleti has much to say! Aúpa Atleti!

read the original article

Key Refereeing Decision in the Madrid Derby

The Champions League second leg match between Atlético de Madrid and Real Madrid continues to generate debate, especially regarding the controversial play that led to the annulment of a goal.

Szymon Marciniak, the referee of the match, has revealed crucial details about his decision, confirming that he was the one who alerted VAR about the possible double touch by Álvarez at the moment of the shot.

Marciniak expressed surprise at the uniqueness of the situation, admitting that he had never faced something similar in his refereeing career. He clarified that no Real Madrid player influenced the review of the play, refuting unfounded rumors.

UEFA, for its part, issued a statement supporting the referee’s decision, with a video that shows Álvarez’s double touch. The refereeing controversy, far from tarnishing the competitive spirit of the team, has reinforced the determination and fighting character that define Atlético de Madrid. These types of adverse situations make us even stronger, demonstrating that with passion and dedication, we can overcome any obstacle. Aúpa Atleti!

read the original article

Up Atleti! Reaction and Future After the Match

Atlético de Madrid has experienced intense days after the Champions League elimination against Real Madrid. Despite the initial “incredulity” regarding the annulment of Julián Álvarez’s goal after VAR intervention, the club maintains a constructive attitude focused on the future.

Internal sources expressed to EFE the “frustration” and “tremendous damage” caused by the situation, considering it an “error in the use of VAR” which, although it will not change the result, has affected the fans’ hope and the team’s effort.

Despite the controversy, Atlético has acted with professionalism, formally requesting explanations from UEFA and showing its willingness to collaborate to improve the refereeing system.

The club acknowledges the seriousness of the incident but maintains its respect for the refereeing work and its commitment to fair play. Atlético de Madrid reaffirms its competitive DNA and its determination to overcome obstacles.

Far from looking for excuses, the club focuses on the next challenges, starting with the important match against Barcelona. The goal is clear: to continue working with dedication to achieve the proposed goals and bring joy to the Colchoneros fans. From the club, a message of unity and optimism is transmitted, inviting the fans to continue supporting the team in every match. Up Atleti!

read the original article

Arbitral Polemic Ignites Atleti Legends

The Atlético de Madrid world is seething after the controversial refereeing decision that disallowed a penalty in their favor. Club legends such as Rubén Cano have raised their voices, calling the situation a “robbery” of historic proportions, even comparing it to the infamous Guruceta case.

Cano, visibly indignant, highlights the presence of cameras and the review by multiple people, which, in his opinion, makes the decision even more inexplicable. The former striker questions the justification of the second touch on the penalty, arguing the physical impossibility of a strike of such power and precision after a prior contact.

Other Rojiblancos references such as ‘Petete’ Correa, who called it a “shame,” and Paulo Futre, have also joined the criticisms, recalling other refereeing errors that have harmed the team, such as the goal disallowed to Perea against Real Madrid.

The Colchoneros fans share the feeling of their idols, expressing their frustration and anger at what they consider an offense. The debate continues to rage, with the athletic community united in defending their colors and their outrage at decisions that, in their view, harm the club. The general feeling is that these types of situations undermine the integrity of the game and deserve a thorough review to prevent them from happening again.

read the original article

Refereeing Controversy in the Euroderby: Atleti Defends Its Position

Atlético de Madrid’s recent Champions League elimination against Real Madrid continues to generate controversy, especially regarding the annulled goal by Julián Álvarez in the penalty shootout.

The referee’s decision, justified by UEFA based on Article 14 of the IFAB, has unleashed the fury of the Rojiblancos fans. However, Atlético clings to an excerpt from the same rule to defend the validity of the goal.

The key lies in the interpretation of the ‘clarity’ of the ball’s movement after the strike. The club believes that Julián’s contact, clearly involuntary, was imperceptible at the time of the penalty and was only proven hours later by UEFA.

This situation has generated an intense debate within UEFA, where the application of the rule in cases of involuntary contact is being questioned. The play, far from being forgotten, promises to continue generating controversy in the coming days.

Atleti, with the support of its fans, does not give up and seeks to defend its position against a decision it considers unfair. The passion and Rojiblancos pride remain intact, ready to face the upcoming challenges with the determination that characterizes the team.

read the original article

Real Madrid's Bench Saves Them in the Euroderby

Real Madrid overcame the European double-header without the expected brilliance of their stars. Names like Mbappé, Vinicius, and Bellingham failed to stand out, but the depth of the bench proved to be key for the team.

In a match where the ‘Fantastic Ones’ didn’t find their best form, other players took on the spotlight. Ancelotti knew how to read the game, and the changes were decisive. Modric, at the Bernabéu, and Camavinga, at the Metropolitano, provided solutions and fresh energy.

Brahim, for his part, showed himself to be a versatile player, capable of unbalancing both from the start and coming off the bench. His performance was crucial in key moments. Despite qualifying, the performance of Vinicius and Mbappé left much to be desired, with few dribbles and little connection to the game.

Bellingham, although hardworking, did not find his usual goal-scoring instinct. The team needs to recover the best version of these players to face the upcoming challenges. However, Ancelotti was optimistic, highlighting the importance of having alternatives in the squad.

Camavinga regained his best level, and Modric proved to be ready for the most demanding matches. The bench responded when it was most needed, demonstrating the strength of the group and the coach’s ability to manage the team. In short, a tie where the bench saved Real Madrid.

read the original article

Euroderbi in Detail: Arbitral Decisions Under the Microscope

The recent Euroderbi at the Metropolitano left a controversial play that has generated debate: the penalty disallowed to Julián Álvarez. UEFA has supported the VAR’s decision, based on FIFA Rule 14.1, which prohibits touching the ball a second time before another player does.

According to the images, Álvarez touches the ball up to three times, invalidating the penalty. Despite the player’s possible bad luck, the rule is clear, and the VAR acted in accordance with current regulations.

It has been suggested that UEFA could review this rule in the future, especially in cases of unintentional touches, but for now, the decision stands. The use of VAR continues to be a subject of debate, especially in the League, where interpretations can be inconsistent.

However, in European competitions, the VAR seems to adhere more strictly to the regulations, as evidenced in the play of Giuliano Simeone, which was not considered a penalty. In summary, although the VAR may generate controversy, its application in the Euroderbi was based on FIFA Rule 14.1. Álvarez’s play has opened a debate about the need to review the rule in unintentional situations, but for now, the arbitral decision is considered correct under the current regulations.

read the original article

Phantom Penalties: The Challenge of Precision

The Metropolitano witnessed a controversial moment during the penalty shootout when Julián Álvarez’s goal was disallowed for touching the ball twice after slipping. This decision, based on the rule that prohibits the kicker from touching the ball a second time before another player does, generated an intense debate.

According to experts like Eduardo Iturralde González, the VOR room may have alerted referee Marciniak about the infraction. These types of situations, although uncommon, are not unprecedented in the world of football.

Similar cases were recalled, such as one in the 2022 World Cup final where Messi scored a goal that, apparently, also involved a double touch, but was validated. Another example remembered was a 2017 European derby at the Vicente Calderón, where Griezmann scored a penalty after slipping and touching the ball with both feet.

On that occasion, the goal was awarded, showing the inconsistency in the application of the rule. Other footballers like Carlos Bacca or Roger Martínez also suffered the annulment of their goals for the same reason. Even River Plate experienced something similar in the Copa Libertadores.

The annulment of Álvarez’s goal sparked controversy, but also demonstrated the thoroughness with which VAR analyzes each play. Despite the adverse result, the Rojiblancos remain faithful and confident that the team will overcome this setback with the determination and fighting spirit that characterize it. Aúpa Atleti!

read the original article